<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitsubishi Evo vs. Subaru Impreza &#8211; Top Gear &#8211; BBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/</link>
	<description>www.SubaruYard.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:39:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alterbr33d</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>alterbr33d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>They have the colors for the cars backwards. Also he mentioned the sound was bad for the STI, well the EVO has a flat monotone buzzing sound, and the STI has more grumble, in the direction of a V8, but different. I think STI this time around is aimed more at some kind of family performance car, where as the EVO is a performance car. I have also heard the trannies in the STI are stronger, supposedly handle up to 800HP. But the evo has got a good automatic, not that I&#039;d want one, but good for othe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have the colors for the cars backwards. Also he mentioned the sound was bad for the STI, well the EVO has a flat monotone buzzing sound, and the STI has more grumble, in the direction of a V8, but different. I think STI this time around is aimed more at some kind of family performance car, where as the EVO is a performance car. I have also heard the trannies in the STI are stronger, supposedly handle up to 800HP. But the evo has got a good automatic, not that I&#8217;d want one, but good for othe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KittyKranker</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>KittyKranker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>I prefer the Subaru.  Don&#039;t like the unfinished look out front of the Mitsu.  The Subie has hatch functionality and goes round the track faster than the Evo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the Subaru.  Don&#8217;t like the unfinished look out front of the Mitsu.  The Subie has hatch functionality and goes round the track faster than the Evo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m5loverx</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>m5loverx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>How can anyone like the design of the new subaru it looks like a shoe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can anyone like the design of the new subaru it looks like a shoe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeNGALi4LFE</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>BeNGALi4LFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>damn i hate it wen the video lags....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn i hate it wen the video lags&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheReapersSon</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>TheReapersSon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>Something these cars have in common:

Both manufacturers royally fucked over the appearance of both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something these cars have in common:</p>
<p>Both manufacturers royally fucked over the appearance of both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: default919</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>default919</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>im not feeling the hatch they couldve made a four door version too but i like the look of the evo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not feeling the hatch they couldve made a four door version too but i like the look of the evo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwousa</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>iwousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of comparing UK only FQ360 to STI......???
I would take STI no questions asked !!!!
People who say it&#039;s ugly, never saw it in real life...
and it&#039;s very practical and doesn&#039;t draw attention...
That&#039;s all I want in a car :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of comparing UK only FQ360 to STI&#8230;&#8230;???<br />
I would take STI no questions asked !!!!<br />
People who say it&#8217;s ugly, never saw it in real life&#8230;<br />
and it&#8217;s very practical and doesn&#8217;t draw attention&#8230;<br />
That&#8217;s all I want in a car <img src='http://www.subaruyard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driftuner</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Driftuner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>ill second that...and we all have to agree, regardless of wich one u prefer, that the build quality of the suby is and has always been better then the mitsus...we all know that subys are basicaly indistructable..take the tranny as an example..subies will handle up to 800hp with stock tranny, and even if u get the 5 speed manual evo, the tranny can barely hold up to 400...ill take the subie..whoever have seen this comparison to the end, have also seen that the suby went faster on the track..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ill second that&#8230;and we all have to agree, regardless of wich one u prefer, that the build quality of the suby is and has always been better then the mitsus&#8230;we all know that subys are basicaly indistructable..take the tranny as an example..subies will handle up to 800hp with stock tranny, and even if u get the 5 speed manual evo, the tranny can barely hold up to 400&#8230;ill take the subie..whoever have seen this comparison to the end, have also seen that the suby went faster on the track..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loh343</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>loh343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>subarus are now hatches because in rally, they behave better that way and they more aerodynamic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subarus are now hatches because in rally, they behave better that way and they more aerodynamic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SabaiDeeKhonLao</title>
		<link>http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>SabaiDeeKhonLao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subaruyard.com/shows/mitsubishi-evo-vs-subaru-impreza-top-gear-bbc/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>the new subie is is not for everyone but it def grows on you. it looks really nice with a good set of rims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new subie is is not for everyone but it def grows on you. it looks really nice with a good set of rims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
